Explaining Science in the Courtroom

Tom Price

Explaining science in the courtroom.

 

image

For nearly 15 years, the Supreme Court has required federal judges to evaluate the quality of scientific evidence presented in trials. In the 1993 case “Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals,” the high court ruled that judges must determine “whether the reasoning or methodology underlying the testimony is scientifically valid.”

Log in or become a member to view the full text of this article.


This article may be available for purchase via the search at Optica Publishing Group.
Optica Members get the full text of Optics & Photonics News, plus a variety of other member benefits.

Add a Comment